Thursday, 23 February 2017

Danfo bus ban will professionalize conductor’s job in Lagos - BCAN

                               Image result for Danfo ban
The Bus Conductors Association of Nigeria (BCAN) has said that the proposed ban of yellow buses (Danfos) by the Lagos State Government would assist in professionalising their jobs.
The National President of the association, Mr Israel Adeshola, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Thursday in Lagos that the development would have positive impacts on the conductor’s’ job in the state.
“The ban is going to have positive impacts on our members; it will promote and elevate our jobs.
“Members of the society have already categorised conductors as touts and illiterates.
“But with the new government policy on transportation system, people will have to get approval from political leaders and traditional rulers before becoming conductor in Lagos State.
“There is no way government can take such decision and sideline over 6000 registered members of BCAN in the state.
“I am sure we are not going to be marginalised in the upcoming system, we are going to be involved in making Lagos a Mega City,’’ he said.

According to him, the association would soon introduce uniforms with tag and identification numbers for easy identification of every conductor.

Adeshola said that conductor’s job was vital in the transportation sector.

Source:dailypost.ng

Justin Trudeau Refuses to Halt Illegal Refugees Crossings into Canada

                                  Image result for Justin Trudeau
The number of refugees crossing the US-Canada border on foot is rapidly growing to unheard-of numbers since US President Trump took office.

That doesn’t seem to be worrying Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, who is determined to keep Canada a safe haven for anyone wanting to make the journey.
According to a reports, the fear of being deported back to unsafe birth countries by Trump’s isolationist immigration policies, is forcing record numbers of Muslim refugees to make a perilous winter journey across the border into Canada on foot.

It’s a trend that the country’s official opposition, Conservative party would like to see halted. They cite security issues and challenged resources as their reasons. Trudeau, however, has remained steadfast saying, “One of the reasons why Canada remains an open country is Canadians trust our immigration system and the integrity of our borders and the help we provide people who are looking for safety.”
    
To read more on this story,visit
www.moroccoworldnews.com/2017/02/209152/justin-trudeau-refuses-to-halt-illegal-refugees-crossings-into-canada/

1983 in Nigerian history:Ghana Must Go!

                                              Image result for Ghana Must Go!
In 1983 Nigeria expels 2 million Ghanaians- The Nigerian government ordered more than a million Ghanaian migrants to leave the country within just a few weeks. When Ghanaians were first expelled en masse from Nigeria in 1983, most of them hurriedly packed their belongings in a big silk bag with red and blue stripes. The Nigerians, either by affection or ridicule, began to call this bag (which is really made in China, and sold even in Europe), “Ghana must go”.
This name gained a fast currency in Ghana, and up till today, that hold-all bag is identified by that

name.

Compiled by Yvonne Williams

1574:The 5th War of Religion breaks out in France.

                           Image result for The 5th War of Religion breaks out in France.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Wars_of_Religion
The French Wars of Religion, or Huguenot Wars of the 16th century, are names for a period of civil infighting, military operations and religious war primarily fought between Roman Catholics and Huguenots (Reformed Protestants) in the Kingdom of France. It involved several pre-modern day principalities around the borders of today's France, like the Kingdom of Navarre and parts of Burgundy, and occasionally spilled beyond the French region, for instance, in the war with Spain, from 1595-1598, into northern Italy, some of the German states of the Holy Roman Empire and the Duchy of Burgundy possessions in the Low Countries.

Approximately 3,000,000 people perished as a result of violence, famine and disease in what is accounted as the second deadliest European religious war (behind the Thirty Years' War, which took 8,000,000 lives in present-day Germany).Unlike all other religious wars at the time, the French wars retained their religious character without being confounded by dynastic considerations.

The conflict involved disputes between the aristocratic houses of France, mainly the Reformed House of Condé (a branch of the House of Bourbon) and the Roman Catholic House of Guise (a branch of the House of Lorraine), and both sides received assistance from foreign sources.

Protestant England and Scotland supported the Protestant side led by the Condés and the Navarrese faction (led by Jeanne d'Albret and her son, Henry of Navarre), while Hapsburg Spain and the Duchy of Savoy supported the Roman Catholic side concentrated around the Guises.

Politiques, consisting of the French kings and their advisers, tried to balance the situation and avoid an open bloodshed between the two religious groups, generally introducing gradual concessions to Huguenots. Catherine de' Medici initially held that stance until she sided with Roman Catholics after the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre, a wave of violence in which Catholic mobs killed tens of thousands of Protestants throughout the entire kingdom.

At the conclusion of the conflict in 1598, Huguenots were granted substantial rights and freedoms by the Edict of Nantes, though it did not end hostility towards them. The wars weakened the authority of the monarchy, already fragile under the rule of Francis II and then Charles IX, though it later reaffirmed its role under Henry IV.

Compiled by Mr Stranger

February 23:The general persecution of Christians in Rome.

                                         Image result for The general persecution of Christians in Rome.
The Diocletianic or Great Persecution was the last and most severe persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire. In 303, the Emperors Diocletian, Maximian, Galerius, and Constantius issued a series of edicts rescinding the legal rights of Christians and demanding that they comply with traditional Roman religious practices. Later edicts targeted the clergy and ordered all inhabitants to sacrifice to the Roman gods (a policy known as universal sacrifice). The persecution varied in intensity across the empire—weakest in Gaul and Britain, where only the first edict was applied, and strongest in the Eastern provinces. Persecutory laws were nullified by different emperors at different times, but Constantine and Licinius's Edict of Milan (313) has traditionally marked the end of the persecution.
Christians had always been subject to local discrimination in the empire, but early emperors were either too reluctant to issue general laws against them or, at least in the 3rd century (see Crisis of the Third Century), too caught up with more immediate issues to do so. It was not until the 250s, under the reigns of Decius and Valerian, that such laws were passed. Under this legislation, Christians were compelled to sacrifice to Roman gods or face imprisonment and execution.When Gallienus acceded in 260, he issued the first imperial edict regarding tolerance toward Christians, leading to nearly 40 years of peaceful coexistence. Diocletian's accession in 284 did not mark an immediate reversal of disregard to Christianity, but it did herald a gradual shift in official attitudes toward religious minorities. In the first 15 years of his rule, Diocletian purged the army of Christians, condemned Manicheans to death, and surrounded himself with public opponents of Christianity. Diocletian's preference for autocratic government, combined with his self-image as a restorer of past Roman glory, presaged the most pervasive persecution in Roman history. In the winter of 302, Galerius urged Diocletian to begin a general persecution of the Christians. Diocletian was wary, and asked the oracle of Apollo for guidance. The oracle's reply was read as an endorsement of Galerius's position, and a general persecution was called on February 24, 303.

Persecutory policies varied in intensity across the empire. Where Galerius and Diocletian were avid persecutors, Constantius was unenthusiastic. Later persecutory edicts, including the calls for universal sacrifice, were not applied in his domain. His son, Constantine, on taking the imperial office in 306, restored Christians to full legal equality and returned property that had been confiscated during the persecution. In Italy in 306, the usurper Maxentius ousted Maximian's successor Severus, promising full religious toleration. Galerius ended the persecution in the East in 311, but it was resumed in Egypt, Palestine, and Asia Minor by his successor, Maximinus. Constantine and Licinius, Severus's successor, signed the Edict of Milan in 313, which offered a more comprehensive acceptance of Christianity than Galerius's edict had provided. Licinius ousted Maximinus in 313, bringing an end to persecution in the East.


The persecution failed to check the rise of the church. By 324, Constantine was sole ruler of the empire, and Christianity had become his favored religion. Although the persecution resulted in death, torture, imprisonment, or dislocation for many Christians, the majority of the empire's Christians avoided punishment. The persecution did, however, cause many churches to split between those who had complied with imperial authority (the traditores), and those who had remained "pure". Certain schisms, like those of the Donatists in North Africa and the Meletians in Egypt, persisted long after the persecutions. The Donatists would not be reconciled to the Church until after 411. In the centuries that followed, some historians consider that Christians created a "cult of the martyrs", and exaggerated the barbarity of the persecutory era. These accounts were criticized during the Enlightenment and afterwards, most notably by Edward Gibbon. Modern historians, such as G. E. M. de Ste. Croix, have attempted to determine whether Christian sources exaggerated the scope of the Diocletianic persecution.

Source: History.com