Hunger strikers Anas Shadid and Ahmad Abu Farah rejected a
deal offered by the Israeli prosecution that guaranteed the imprisoned
Palestinians would be released after a renewed four months on their
administrative detention -- an Israeli policy of internment without charge or
trial based on undisclosed evidence, according to a statement released Saturday
by the Palestinian Committee of Prisoners’ Affairs.
The committee said that Shadid, 20 and Abu Farah, 29, who
have been on hunger strike for 70 and 71 days, respectively, rejected the deal
that would see their administrative detention renewed for another four months,
but with a guarantee of release at its conclusion.
The hunger strikers reiterated their commitment to continue
their hungers strikes until they are completely released from administrative
detention, according to the committee.
Shadid and Abu Farah declared a hunger strike on Sept. 24
and 23, respectively in protest of being placed in administrative detention
after being detained by Israeli forces.
The Palestinian Committee of Prisoners’ Affairs stated last
month that both had slipped into a coma and have partially or completely lost
their ability to breath, speak, drink, and hear. The committee also warned that
Israeli authorities had threatened to force feed both hunger strikers.
Meanwhile, the head of the Israeli medical center where they
have been treated warned of the increasing risk of “sudden death.”
An Israeli court temporarily suspended the prisoners’
detention orders on Nov. 18 due to the deteriorating health of the hunger
strikers, according to Palestinian prisoner solidarity network Samidoun.
However, the hunger strikers have continued to refuse food until they are
completely released from detention and transferred to a Palestinian hospital.
Scores of Palestinian prisoners have launched hunger strikes
in the past year to protest various issues, most notably administrative
detention. The most prominent hunger strikers included Muhammad al-Qiq, Bilal
Kayid, and brothers Muhammad and Mahmoud Balboul.
Although Israeli authorities claim the withholding of
evidence during administrative detention, which allows detention for three to
six-month renewable intervals based on undisclosed evidence, is essential for
state security concerns, rights groups have instead claimed the policy allows
Israeli authorities to hold Palestinians for an indefinite period of time
without showing any evidence that could justify their detentions.
Rights groups have claimed that Israel's administrative
detention policy has been used as an attempt to disrupt Palestinian political
and social processes, notably targeting Palestinian politicians, activists, and
journalists.
According to Addameer, 7,000 Palestinians were being held in
Israeli prisons as of October, 720 of whom were being held in administrative
detention.
No comments:
Post a Comment