The embattled leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mr.
Nnamdi Kanu, has declared that he preferred being held in the
detention than subjecting himself to a trial. He noted that the outcomes
of previous trials had been abused or neglected by the Department of
State Services (DSS). Kanu spoke during hearing of a fresh sixcount
charge against him at the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja. Kanu
said:
“I will not have a fair trial in this very court because
information available to me indicates that I will not receive fair trial
before this very judge. “I will not, for any reasons, sacrifice the due
process of law founded on the principle of natural justice on the altar
of my speedy release from detention. “In other words, I will rather
remain in the detention than subject myself to a trial that I know
amounts to pervasion of justice.
“After all, previous orders have
been made in my favour by courts of competent jurisdiction that my
accuser, the DSS, failed to carry out.” But, prosecution counsel,
Mohamed Diri, told the court that based on section 396 (2) of the
constitution, the defendant had no right to object to being tried by the
court until after the plea is heard. Justice A.R Mohammed of the
Federal High Court sitting in Abuja countered the prosecution counsel,
saying that Kanu had the right to reject the trial. “After all, justice
is rooted on confidence,” he said. “If any of the parties has no
confidence in the court, he has the right to say so,” the court held.
The Federal High Court has charged Kanu alongside two others, Benjamin
Madubugwu and David Nwawuisi, in a fresh six-count charge of treason and
managing the affairs of ‘an unlawful society.’ In the fresh charge, the
Federal Government accused Kanu of plotting to split Nigeria, by
creating a Biafra Republic with South-East, South-South states, and
parts of Kogi and Benue states, as component units.
No comments:
Post a Comment