No matter how you feel about the outcome of the presidential
election, it certainly can’t hurt to try to derive lessons from it, including
those we can apply to our own lives. Here are some lessons on effective
communication:
Encouraging unpopular views beats suppressing them.
Prohibiting or censoring unpopular views doesn’t eliminate them. It merely pushes them into the shadows of one’s
mind. In this case, that applies to opinions of millions of voters who felt
disregarded and seen only as sources of redistribution to others. These days, many
such people feel too uncomfortable to raise concerns about such policies, even
to pollsters. Perhaps the only place they feel they can express their views
without retribution is the voting booth. That may at least partly explain why
the pollsters underestimated Trump’s chances.
So those unpopular thoughts lie within, sometimes festering
in their skulls’ protective case, insulated from counterpoints. Too, their
detractors are protected from what such people believe is a profoundly correct
position.
Lesson for us all: We
all should encourage an open exchange of ideas. Not all wisdom resides on one
side of the ideological center.
Educate, don’t manipulate. We in the media, who are in a
position to influence others, need to realize that we pay a price when we try
to manipulate opinion rather than making all efforts to report fairly. If we
actually believe in democracy, we’re not supposed to be kingmakers. We’re
supposed to unearth ideas from a wide range of perspectives and present them as
fairly as possible so our audience members can make up their own minds.Two
clients told me they voted for Trump in part to send a message to the media
that it can't manipulate them.
Alas, if the trend continues, rather than the media resuming
its rightful place as reporter of information, it will likely just expand its
targets: trying to convince red-state voters that additionally redistributing
to others is in their interests. That may result in the media’s reputation
sinking further. According to a Gallup poll, journalists are already among the
least trusted professionals, scoring just 20 out of 100 points, tied with
lawyers and just above politicians and car salespeople.
Lesson for us all. Whether we’re a writer, counselor,
relative, or lover, we're wise to follow psychologists' core axiom that our job
is not mainly to give advice but to fair-mindedly facilitate people coming to
their own conclusion.
Genuineness trumps primping.
Hillary Clinton's appearance was perfect, perhaps too perfect. For
example, in the debates, when Donald Trump was attacking her, she maintained a
perfect smile with raised chin. In contrast, Trump's clear outrage would be
shot down by any media consultant. Nonetheless, to many voters, it felt
authentic and thus trustworthy.
Lesson for us all: Invoke not an overly primped persona but
your best real self.
Empathy, even with your enemy, is required for effective
communication. Many people have no positive feelings about Donald Trump. They
believe it is hubristic of him to think he is qualified to be president. They
think that his treatment of women, even if not current, disqualifies him from
being the nation’s role-model in chief. Such people view his intellect as
shallow, reducing complex issues to bumper-sticker rhetoric. Until he learned to
use a teleprompter, such people viewed his discursive, redundant,
self-absorbed, bombastic public speaking skills as undeserving of even a
passing grade in a high school class let alone as president of the United Sta But
even his detractors might be wise to afford him a bit of empathy. After all, he
faces the Herculean challenge of leading a deeply divided America on such
thorny issues as jobs, health care, immigration, the national debt, race,
terrorism, Russia, China, and the Middle East. That may be tough for anyone to
succeed at. Even the apparently uber-confident Trump might privately be afraid
he’ll fail, damage the nation, and that his failure will be made even more
likely because of his limited political capital even within his own party. As
bad, he’ll likely face ongoing assaults from society’s key mind-molders: the
colleges and the media. For Trump's advisors, let alone his detractors, to make
any headway with him will require them to have some empathy for him, to walk a
bit in his shoes.
Lesson for us all: Try to find a basis for empathy, of
common ground, even with your enemies. At minimum, that can reduce your anger
or pain, plus it can free you to engage in the aforementioned open,
constructive conversations. That can benefit both of you and maybe even
society.
Written by Marty Nemko Ph.D
Named the San Francisco Bay Area's "Best Career
Coach," Marty Nemko has been career and personal coach to 4,500 clients
and enjoys a 96% client-satisfaction rate. The author of seven books (250,000
copies sold) including How to Do Life: What They Didn’t Teach You in School
(link is external) plus over 2,000(!) published articles, including on Time.com
(link is external)where he also writes, Marty Nemko is in his 26th year as host
of Work with Marty Nemko on KALW-FM (NPR-San Francisco.) He was the one man in
a one-man PBS-TV Pledge Drive Special. Marty Nemko holds a Ph.D. in educational
psychology from the University of California, Berkeley and subsequently taught
there. He is married to Barbara Nemko, the Napa County Superintendent of
Schools.
No comments:
Post a Comment