Christian leadership is not for the lone wolf. The labor is
too important when souls are in the balance, and all of us are simply too frail
and shortsighted, with too much indwelling sin and too many blind spots, to go
at it on our own.
Whatever the role, whether on the college campus, or in the
inner city, or among an unreached people group, or in the local church, we
desperately need each other in all of life, and especially in leadership.
Christian leadership is a team sport, and in a post-Enlightenment society,
still deeply affected by modernist individualism, the biblical model of
plurality in leadership is a desperately needed corrective, and a powerfully
redemptive grace.
Team leadership does not mean there is no “chief among
equals”; it’s both inevitable and good among any group that one person
eventually functions as the “senior” or the final buck-stopper — might as well
name that and make it plain. But the clear model in the New Testament is team
leadership in the local church — plurality, we call it. “Without exception,”
says Gregg Allison, “every time the New Testament mentions the government of a
particular church, the leadership structure is a plurality of elders” (Sojourners
and Strangers, 293).
Wiser Together
Before providing a dozen additional benefits of plurality in
leadership, here is a headlining principle: We are wiser together. “Without
counsel plans fail, but with many advisers they succeed” (Proverbs 15:22). “By
wise guidance you can wage your war, and in abundance of counselors there is
victory” (Proverbs 24:6).
The vast majority of decisions we face in life each day are
not clearly laid out in biblical do’s and don’ts. The way we learn to do “what
is good and acceptable and perfect” is by being “transformed by the renewal of
your minds, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God” (Romans
12:2). We don’t live life following a list. Rather, God remakes us from the
inside into increasingly new people, and as we’re “renewed in the spirit of
your minds” (Ephesians 4:23), we exercise wisdom as we “try to discern what is
pleasing to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:10). As we are “filled with the knowledge of
his will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding” (Colossians 1:9), we learn
to “approve what is excellent” (Philippians 1:10).
Plurality in leadership, then, is the corporate
manifestation of such sobermindedness, sanctified level-headedness. The
toughest decisions we face in leadership are not clear do’s and don’ts. And in
leadership, the messes multiply, and the decisions become more difficult. What
we desperately need is to exercise a collective wisdom stemming from God’s
remaking of us, not just individually but together. We need to supplement each
other’s judgment, and seek to discern together God’s path for the ministry we
lead. Which is why one of the first characteristics required of elders in the
church is “sober-mindedness” (1 Timothy 3:2).
A Dozen More Gifts
When we have carefully guarded the door to leadership on the
way in, and we know each other well enough to confirm we’re walking together in
the light, then we can exercise great trust in the team’s sense of direction.
We are significantly wiser together than alone.
Of course, there are drawbacks to plurality in leadership.
Even though it’s more likely that an individual will be led astray, whole
groups have been deceived and corrupted. And as Alexander Strauch concedes,
“Team leadership in a church family can be painfully slow and terribly
aggravating” (Biblical Eldership, 44). That’s true. But on the whole, the
benefits of leading together far outweigh going at it alone.
Here, then, are a dozen more benefits, among others, to
supplement the truth that we indeed are wiser together. (These are not meant to
heap discouragement on those who are in singular leadership situations and
would love to be surrounded by fellows but have none. Rather, we hope they will
give you incentive to keep praying for, and investing in the lives of, future
teammates in ministry.)
1. More Strengths, Fewer Weaknesses
Plurality in leadership means rounding out our giftings with
the talents of others, and pooling our complementary gifts to do the work more
effectively. God gives “gifts that differ according to the grace given to us”
(Romans 12:6). Even among leaders, there are varieties of gifts, service, and
activities (1 Corinthians 12:4–6). Leadership is better when together we are
“good stewards of God’s varied grace” (1 Peter 4:10).
And as we pool our strengths, we make up for our
deficiencies. Leading together covers many of our weaknesses. In a team
setting, our individual lapses in judgment cause less damage, if any; other
voices can speak up and point in another direction. It’s okay to be imperfect;
others can see our blind spots and bring correction. And leading together can
guard against domineering tendencies in individual leaders, as peers stand
alongside to sharpen and challenge them.
2. Healthier Teaching
It’s good for individual teachers to make their provocative
points, have their well-placed hyperboles, and exhibit their own winsome quirks
and idiosyncrasies. But when they’re alone over the long haul, they can
introduce wobbles and imbalances into local church life. Any group with only
one teacher will become painfully like that leader if you give it enough time.
At the heart of Christian leadership is speaking God’s words
(Hebrews 13:7). So pastors and elders must be skillful in teaching (1 Timothy
3:2; Titus 1:9). And it’s just as important to have a plurality of elders in
public teaching as it is in private meetings and decisions. Also, when there is
a team of qualified teacher-leaders, they can teach in various settings. In
this way, there are multiple significant influences on the people. No one teacher
has all the gifts, and all the balance, that a healthy, vibrant community
needs.
3. Lightening the Workload
Pastoral leadership can be very demanding. Not only is there
the proactive labors of preparation and delivery of public teaching, and the long
meetings to make mind-bending decisions, but also the intensive reactive
ministry of responding to needs in the flock. When we lead together, we share
the heavy load that shepherding can be at times. When we divide the labor and
distribute the weight of ministry, we make everyday life more livable for
leaders and protect them from exhaustion and burn out.
4. Being Pastored and Accountable
Plurality in leadership also provides essential care and
accountability. When the church’s most public leader has peers who can speak
into his life, and hold him to the fire, there is less room for subtly taking
advantage of privilege and making self-serving decisions. And for every
Christian shepherd, our more fundamental identity is being one of the sheep
(Luke 10:20). Pastors need to be pastored. We all need to be held accountable
and have some structure for being called out if we get off track, as well as
led proactively into greener pastures.
5. More Safety Together
Often in Christian leadership, we encounter situations that
seem far beyond us as individuals. We simply don’t know what to do, or what
counsel to give. We’re confused and torn; we feel stuck.
Leading together not only makes us wiser together when many
options are on the table, but also helps us to move carefully forward, one step
at a time, into a situation in which we’re not even sure there’s one good
option. As Proverbs 11:14 says, “in an abundance of counselors there is
safety.”
6. More Support from the Church
Because elders are first and foremost sheep, not shepherds,
they are “of the people.” This office is different than that of Apostle, as
those who represent the Chief Shepherd in a more significant sense. We might
say that while the apostles are “of God,” the elders are “of the people.”
The elders are from the people, and among the people, and
having a plurality of elders among the people helps to create congregational
support for decisions, before and after the fact. A single leader is not able
to influence and win support and deal with individual circumstances nearly so
strongly as a team working together.
7. Less Sting from Unjust Criticism
Flying solo in leadership means all the sting lands squarely
on the lone wolf. But when we lead as a team, and make and own decisions as a
team, we’re less exposed to unjust criticism for those decisions. We still feel
the sting, but not nearly so sharply as when we take it together. Which connects,
then, to our ability to encourage one another in difficulty.
8. More Encouragement in Difficulty
All leadership in a fallen world involves difficulty sooner
than later. It’s just a matter of time. And perhaps all the more in Christian
leadership, because so much is at stake, and because there is a genuine Enemy
with schemes against us.
Trials will come, but when we lead together, we’re in much
better condition to walk in those trials without losing hope. Together, we
strengthen each other to continue truly, deeply, continually rejoicing, even as
we experience great sorrow. Having peers in leadership proves to be a priceless
encouragement in trouble.
9. More Stable in Transition
Transition comes to every leadership team if the
organization is healthy and survives for much duration of time. In particular,
when the senior leader transitions, whether to retirement or some other
vocation, the plurality contributes greatly to stability during change.
10. More Sanctifying
Not only is there the collective wisdom, but leading
together makes us better as individuals. Shared leadership is more sanctifying
than leading alone. Leading together, says Strauch,
exposes our
impatience with one another, our stubborn pride, our bull-headedness, our
selfish immaturity, our domineering disposition, our lack of love and
understanding of one another, and our prayerlessness. It also shows us how
underdeveloped and immature we really are in humility, brotherly love, and true
servant spirit. (114)
Leading together makes each of us better. “Iron sharpens
iron” (Proverbs 27:17).
11. Greater Joy Together
Leading together also brings greater joy than going at it
alone. “It is much more satisfying . . . to pastor as a team than to be a
lone-wolf shepherd” (Jeremie Rinne, Church Elders, 95). While at times it may
feel easier to make all the calls yourself, the joy of leading together, with
all its attendant difficulties, far surpasses the simplicity of being the king
of the hill.
12. Together Under the Chief
Finally, and most significantly, working as a team of
undershepherds should remind us continually that there is only one “chief
Shepherd” (1 Peter 5:4). We undershepherds are plural, but there is a singular
great “Shepherd and Overseer of your souls” (1 Peter 2:25), only one “great
shepherd of the sheep” (Hebrews 13:20). He is the one with shoulders broad enough
to role all our burdens for the flock onto him (1 Peter 5:7). He is the one who
has promised that he will build his church (Matthew 16:18) and that his gospel
will go to all the nations (Matthew 24:14) through the church (Ephesians 1:22;
3:21).
The reality of plurality reminds us that we are not the lone
leader of Christ’s church. He is.
Written by David Mathis
David Mathis (@davidcmathis) is executive editor for
desiringGod.org, pastor at Cities Church in Minneapolis/Saint Paul, and adjunct
professor for Bethlehem College & Seminary. He is a husband, father of
four, and author of Habits of Grace: Enjoying Jesus through the Spiritual
Disciplines.
No comments:
Post a Comment